<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://kingwarzcharts.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Template%3AGrading_scheme</id>
	<title>Template:Grading scheme - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://kingwarzcharts.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Template%3AGrading_scheme"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://kingwarzcharts.com/index.php?title=Template:Grading_scheme&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-07-21T16:52:27Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.9</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://kingwarzcharts.com/index.php?title=Template:Grading_scheme&amp;diff=2701&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Kingwarz at 06:01, 2 March 2025</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://kingwarzcharts.com/index.php?title=Template:Grading_scheme&amp;diff=2701&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-03-02T06:01:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--&amp;lt;caption&amp;gt;--&amp;gt;{{Navbar-header|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;King Warz Charts content quality grading scheme&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;|Grading scheme}}&amp;lt;!--&amp;lt;/caption&amp;gt;--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable plainlinks&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width: 100%;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width: 5%;&amp;quot; | Class!! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width: 39%;&amp;quot; |Criteria!! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width: 21%;&amp;quot; |Reader&amp;#039;s experience!! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width: 24%;&amp;quot; |Editing suggestions!! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width: 11%;&amp;quot; |Example&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Grading scheme/row&lt;br /&gt;
 |class      = FA&lt;br /&gt;
 |Project    = {{{Project|{{{topic|}}}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |criteria   = The article has attained [[King Warz Charts:Featured articles|featured article]] status by King Warz.&lt;br /&gt;
 |detail     = The article meets the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[King Warz Charts:Featured article criteria|featured article criteria]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
 |reader     = Outstanding, complete, free of grammar errors and follows every relevant rules in the Manual of Style.&lt;br /&gt;
 |suggestion = No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible (especially for artist pages).&lt;br /&gt;
 |specified  = {{{FA_example|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |default    =&lt;br /&gt;
 |oldid      = &lt;br /&gt;
 |date       = &lt;br /&gt;
}}{{Grading scheme/row&lt;br /&gt;
 |trigger    = {{{A|yes}}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |class      = A&lt;br /&gt;
 |Project    = {{{Project|{{{topic|}}}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |criteria   = The article is well organized and essentially complete, after an analysis by King Warz. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.&lt;br /&gt;
 |detail     = The article meets the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[King Warz Charts:Content assessment/A-Class criteria|A-Class criteria]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;:&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;{{King Warz Charts:Content assessment/A-Class criteria|raw=yes}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |reader     = Very useful to readers as the article is detailed. All the relevant details that are required (per the Manual of Style) is present. &lt;br /&gt;
 |suggestion = Some tweak the article may be needed, and style problems may need solving.&lt;br /&gt;
 |specified  = {{{A_example|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |default    = &lt;br /&gt;
 |oldid      = &lt;br /&gt;
 |date      = &lt;br /&gt;
}}{{#ifeq:{{{A|yes}}}|yes||[[Category:Grading schemes without A-Class]]}}{{Grading scheme/row&lt;br /&gt;
 |class      = GA&lt;br /&gt;
 |Project    = {{{Project|{{{topic|}}}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |criteria   = The article meets {{em|all}} of the [[King Warz Charts:Good article criteria|good article criteria]].&lt;br /&gt;
 |detail     = {{King Warz Charts:Good article criteria}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |reader     = Extremely useful to readers as the article is detailed and elaborate. And it also follows every guidelines listed in the Manual of Style.&lt;br /&gt;
 |suggestion = Some tweak the article may be needed. Make sure to keep articles up to date especially for Week and artist pages &lt;br /&gt;
 |specified  = {{{GA_example|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |default    = &lt;br /&gt;
 |oldid      = &lt;br /&gt;
 |date       = &lt;br /&gt;
}}{{Grading scheme/row&lt;br /&gt;
 |class      = B&lt;br /&gt;
 |Project    = {{{Project|{{{topic|}}}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |criteria   = The article meets {{em|all}} of the [[King Warz Charts:Content assessment/B-Class criteria|B-Class criteria]]. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach [[King Warz Charts:Good_article_criteria|good article standards]].&lt;br /&gt;
 |detail     = {{King Warz Charts:Content assessment/B-Class criteria|raw=yes}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |reader     = Readers are not left wanting, although the content should be or can be better&lt;br /&gt;
 |suggestion = A few aspects of content and/or style need to be addressed. General compliance with the [[King Warz Charts:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]].&lt;br /&gt;
 |specified  = {{{B_example|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |default    = &lt;br /&gt;
 |oldid      = &lt;br /&gt;
 |date       = &lt;br /&gt;
}}{{Grading scheme/row&lt;br /&gt;
 |class      = C&lt;br /&gt;
 |Project    = {{{Project|{{{topic|}}}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |criteria   = The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material.&lt;br /&gt;
 |detail     = Most articles, upon creation are C-class articles meaning that it contains most of the relevant information but it needs better content before it can be classified as an A, B, or GA article&lt;br /&gt;
 |reader     = Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture.&lt;br /&gt;
 |suggestion = Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and ensuring compliance with the MoS.&lt;br /&gt;
 |specified  = {{{C_example|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |default    =&lt;br /&gt;
 |oldid      =&lt;br /&gt;
 |date       = &lt;br /&gt;
}}{{Grading scheme/row&lt;br /&gt;
 |class      = Start&lt;br /&gt;
 |Project    = {{{Project|{{{topic|}}}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |criteria   = An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. &lt;br /&gt;
 |detail     = &lt;br /&gt;
 |reader     = Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.&lt;br /&gt;
 |suggestion = Add the relevant details that are needed&lt;br /&gt;
 |specified  = {{{Start_example|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |default    =&lt;br /&gt;
 |oldid      = &lt;br /&gt;
 |date       = &lt;br /&gt;
}}{{Grading scheme/row&lt;br /&gt;
 |class      = Stub&lt;br /&gt;
 |Project    = {{{Project|{{{topic|}}}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |criteria   = A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.&lt;br /&gt;
 |detail     = &lt;br /&gt;
 |reader     = Provides very little meaningful content; may like a couple sentences. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the page and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.&lt;br /&gt;
 |suggestion = Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. &lt;br /&gt;
 |specified  = {{{Stub_example|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
 |default    = &lt;br /&gt;
 |oldid      = &lt;br /&gt;
 |date       = &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Documentation}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Add categories to the /doc subpage, interwikis to Wikidata, not here --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kingwarz</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>